***
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uHukbDOu9k
press either.
Are they here already? Did they come in comets and space rock debris and meteorites? Did they evolve over billions of years from viruses, microbes to invertebrates then finally to us?
Are we THEM? Are we migrant aliens in our own land? Yes brother, we are.
Hail the great spirit of interacting universal
http://www.freewebs.com/area51topsecret/ AREA 51
......................................................It was only a few days ago when I was pondering the supposed energy shortage that my recollection of a T.V. demonstration returned. It was something I had marveled at thirty years before, but had almost forgotten. Remembering it, an idea began to form and I soon found myself at my desk with pencil and paper inventing a revolutionary means of transport.
"Let's see now," I mused "It better be disk- shaped so it will be able to skim along the sky and change direction in a flash!"
I became enthusiastic thinking that I could invent a machine using a different energy source, That of "gravity."
What I had seen on T.V. was a fairly puny man trying to lift a bar with circular weights (the same king of device that weightlifters use.)
Obviously it was too much for him.
Stage two of this demonstration was this guy using an electric motor to spin the circular weight on one end and then doing the same thing to the weight on the other end. With the two heavy weights revolving at high speed he lifted the bar high about his head with one hand.
Remembering this, I reasoned that I could use this principle to raise a weight (the human body?) and move it around in the air. I figured that additional energy would be necessary from a conventional motor to help with the lift and proposed that a small helicopter blade and motor would do the job, or maybe a fan below would give enough lift.
The hybrid machine would use much less conventional fuel. as much of the energy would come from gravity (or was it anti-gravity?)
I had a vague feeling that the principles of the gyroscope was involved.
So I did what I always do, I checked the internet.
To my surprise (perhaps chagrin) I found that my idea has already been extensively tested and the results have been patented.
Out the window went my hopes for fame and glory as tumbled back to reality with a bump.
Still it doesn't matter who invented it, does it? As long as someone gets it into production.(Ric)
http://newilluminati.blog-city.com/antigravity_machine.htm
Sandy Kidd set out to create an anti-gravity machine in 1980, a device which could one day power flying saucers with energy derived from high-speed gyroscopes. While working as a planning engineer with a North Sea oil company for four years, he spent nearly every spare minute in a makeshift workshop in his garden shed in Dundee, Scotland. Then, at Christmas in 1984, his machine generated its first vertical thrust. “Not much, but it was there and I was over the moon,” he recalls. A few weeks later the device was demonstrated at Imperial College, London, for Professor Eric Laithwaite, a pioneering expert on gyroscopes.
After watching the three kilogram, 45-centimetre unit with a gyroscope at each end of a crossarm rise from the test-bench against a counter-weight, he described Kidd as ‘ingenious’.
“What we have here is a potential space drive,” Laithwaite said. “Properly developed, this would take you to the outer universe on a spoonful of uranium.”
Two years later, research physicist Dr Bill Ferrier of Dundee university examined the device on campus. “Its potential is mind-boggling,” Ferrier announced. After Sandy Kidd moved to Australia a second prototype was tested in Melbourne for three days under the supervision of specialist engineers. Placed in a sealed wooden box, it was suspended from a cord attached to an overhead beam fitted with sensitive measuring instruments. Powered by a model aircraft engine, the entire device lost weight as the vertical thrust overcame the ‘force’ of gravity.
“It created enough thrust to float a small orange through the middle of a room,” said Kidd. “People in the laboratory were clearly shaken.”
The Kidd Machine produces lift without reacting on air, water or a solid surface and therefore appears to be defying Newton’s Third Law of Motion that states that every action must have an equal and opposite reaction.
“What Kidd has achieved will certainly shake the scientific world to the core when they realize the implications of the results,” announced prematurely optimistic astrophysicist Dr Harold Aspden of Southampton University in the 1980s. “It should now be possible to build a machine big enough to lift itself off the ground with a full payload.”
Mr Kidd was working under contract to BWN, an Australian-based company. BWN refused to divulge laboratory details despite wide mainstream media disclosure, including demonstrations on a number of TV programs. “Full public disclosure would simply encourage others to build similar devices and perhaps overtake us,” said Noel Carrol of BWN. “Industrial espionage is another risk we face.” Work to increase lift and design a commercial prototype “may take several years but we’ll get there,” said Kidd in 1988…
My question (from Ric Williams, webmaster) "If that happened back in 1988, what has happened in the last twenty years? Have the multi-national oil companies and motor manufacturers bought the patent and shelved it so they can continue to make trillions from motorists paying far too much for gasoline?"
See http://www.gyroscopes.org/propulsion.asp and http://au.geocities.com/psyberplasm/ch4.html and http://www.geocities.com/r_ayana/FreeEnergy2.html for far more
- R.A.
- Images - http://www.gyroscopes.org/propulsion.asp
+copy.jpg)
.jpg)
G
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment